However, they displayed a dose-dependent inhibition of CDK2 kinase activity in in-vitro ADP-Glo™ assay with IC50 values of 23.47 and 82.04 nM, respectively, compared to 0.51 and 700 nM for Dinaciclib and Roscovitine, respectively. Compound 6 downregulated CDK2 protein targets involved in DNA replication process; Polα, MCM7, ORC2, and ORC4 in CRC cell lines. Subjected to cell cycle analysis, HCT-116 and HT-29 treated with compound 6 demonstrated pre-G1 phase arrest with no similar observation in S phase.
A HB patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model was treated with placebo, vincristine + irinotecan (VI), dinaciclib, or VI + dinaciclib to evaluate tumor growth and response to therapy. In our PDX model, treatment with VI + dinaciclib resulted in decreased tumor volume, viability and HB cell proliferation. Given these findings, combination treatment with VI and dinaciclib should be investigated further as a treatment for chemoresistant HB.
The hexokinase activity of HKDC1 is also insensitive to Dinaciclib, a pan cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that reportedly disrupts the ability of nuclear localized HKDC1 to phosphorylate retinoblastoma-binding protein 5...An HKDC1 variant associated with retinitis pigmentosa, T58M, displays a modest, but statistically significant 2-fold decrease in catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km,glucose) compared to the wild-type enzyme. Together, our results provide a detailed functional characterization of recombinant HKDC1 and set the stage for investigating the link between HKDC1 catalysis and human disease.
Daporinad, dinaciclib, and sepantronium bromide were predicted as potential drugs for the majority of cancer types. Potential biomarkers had been identified that may predict responses to immunotherapy and improve survival outcomes for cancer patients. This study provided a detailed overview of the functional roles, genetic and epigenetic alterations, and prognostic significance of PRMTs in pan-cancer.
Docking studies identified interactions of the five selected candidates with crucial residues of CDK3. Global reactivity suggested favourable electronic properties for receptor binding. MD simulations, MM-PBSA and ONIOM revealed stable ligand-receptor interactions and favourable binding energetics. Extended 1200ns simulations of the two hits, CID_11212010 and CID_25211747, demonstrated exceptional stability of CID_25211747 with minimal conformational fluctuation. Additional ONIOM calculations reproduced the strong binding affinity of CID_25211747 with CDK3. Collectively, these results nominate CID_25211747 as a promising lead towards the development of effective CDK3 antagonists, offering valuable insight for future drug design.
This study elucidates the epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms driving the CDK1-SOX9-BCL-xL axis in gastric cancer chemoresistance. Pharmacological inhibition of CDK1 effectively disrupts this axis, restoring cisplatin sensitivity and suppressing tumor growth in gastric cancer models. The observed synergy between dinaciclib and cisplatin underscores a promising therapeutic strategy to overcome chemoresistance in gastric cancer.
Biochemical profiling showed that CAY10603 is not only HDAC6-selective but also exhibits pan-HDAC activity similar to suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, enabling dual targeting of transcriptional and cell cycle pathways. In an orthotopic NSG mouse model, dinaciclib + CAY10603 significantly reduced leukemia burden and extended survival without adverse toxicity. By "normalizing" TP53-mutant AML to respond like its wild-type counterpart, this pan-HDAC/multi-CDK blockade offers a TP53-agnostic therapeutic option and warrants clinical evaluation as a strategy that remains effective regardless of baseline allelic status.
This study investigated three CDKis (abemaciclib, fadraciclib, and dinaciclib) alone or combined with retinoic acid (RA) to assess the effects on morphology, growth, gene expression, and the induction of immunogenic cell death in NB cell lines with (LAN-1 and CHLA-90) and without (CHLA-172) MYCN amplification. CDKi treatments promote NB differentiation via ER stress, with cytotoxicity enhanced by RA co-treatment. This may increase NB immunogenicity and support immunotherapy eligibility.
ER stress and the UPR are activated in CCC, and proteasome inhibitors disrupt this balance, ultimately leading to cell death. AGR2 may serve as a potential therapeutic target in CCC.
We discovered that in addition to the known JAK inhibitors Ruxolitinib and Baricitinib, Dinaciclib, a CDK1/2/5/9 inhibitor, and Ganetespib, a Hsp90 inhibitor, significantly inhibit both PD-L1 and CXCL10 expression in the model cells. These drugs also significantly inhibited delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) in-vivo in an inflammation mouse model. Our novel screening platform can therefore be used in the future to identify novel immunomodulators and pathways in cancer and inflammation, expanding therapeutic horizons.
In conclusion, these findings highlight Dinaciclib's therapeutic promise in OSCC by simultaneously disrupting cell cycle progression and inducing apoptosis. These results support further exploration of Dinaciclib as a viable monotherapy or combination treatment in OSCC and other HNSC subtypes to improve patient outcomes.